Blood, Verse & Roses: Can Poetry Pay the Rent in 2025?

ON MAY 02, 2025 / BY EDITORS GEORGE DAVEY & SHIBRA KHAN

Every year, The Brunel Writer Prize is awarded to the student with the highest graded article submission for the Creative Industries module on Brunel University’s Creative Writing Programme. Rowan Reddington was a runner-up for The Brunel Writer Prize 2025 with his satirical analysis of the economics of being a poet in the 21st century.

The typical weeknight meal of a working poet.

I.

NO.*

II.

*Not unless you
do a Walt Whitman:

eat beans in a shed,
bin-dive for bread.

(Tricky since Aldi
began to lock the lids.

Don’t ask how the poet
knows about this…)

III. Switching to prose (-poetry?) for the deep dive…

The conventional answer is ‘Sorry, kid. Step away from the quill.’ You can eat, write, and rhyme… just not all three at once. It’s tough enough being a novelist. And people read novels.

This bleak prognosis is usually served with the caveat that writers need day jobs, side hustles, or rich benefactors (like an entrenched class system!). It won’t be long till you hear the c-word flying about.

Copywriting.

Because you honed your ear and eye and heart in order to line shareholders’ pockets, right? Because the primary role of the poet is to ease consumers’ suspicions that the annihilation of the living earth won’t be allayed by Fanta bottles being made from 80% recycled plastic… and the secondary role of the poet is to persuade the people on the escalators at Liverpool St. station that BAE systems are a cosy, family business not the stonehearted beneficiaries of industrial murder, yeah?

‘OK. So… not a fan of copywriting, then,’ says the bemused, well-meaning, but essentially disapproving distant relative/beleaguered colleague/long-suffering friend that you’ve cornered or been cornered by at some imaginary social function. (An optimistically early-season BBQ, let’s say).

The next unsolicited piece of advice, posing as a question and accompanied by aerial chunks of charred chipolata, that will leave this person’s mouth (once they’re done glancing furtively up at that dark, blimp-like raincloud on the horizon) will be: ‘You could be an Instapoet?’

You go to speak but they cut you off.

‘No wait, let me guess,’ they say, between glugs of warm cider (your second cousin was right: your great-uncle does have a drinking problem). ‘Peddling paper-thin platitudes that pander to the misanthropic tech conglomerates’ commodification of our very minds, via that euphemistically-named techno-succubus, the “attention economy”… that’s not poetry, either. Is it?’

Touché, Len! you want to shout.

But ‘cause you’re a deep and unfathomable Artist, you say: ‘Actually, I like Rupi Kaur. It’s not her fault I get stuck watching cat videos. And no one gets into Eliot first—’ dramatic pause as the first raindrops splatter off Len’s former-county-hockey-player nose. ‘Maybe, Len, milk and honey are gateway drugs?’

You’re pleased with that piece of dialogue. You make a mental note.

‘What?’ says Len, sheltering beneath an untouched platter of homemade coleslaw.

In my humble opinion, you’ve both got a point. On the one hand, it’s true that Instapoets may have saved poetry: the meteoric rise of poets like Kaur has coincided with a significant bump in sales. On the other, social media poetry must be get-able on first encounter. A recipe for vapid verse if there ever was one.

(𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚟𝚊𝚙𝚒𝚍 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎
𝟷 x 𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏-𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚙 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚎
𝟷 x 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚜/𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚗
𝟷 x 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚡

𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚔𝚎
𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚒𝚗 𝚙𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗-𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚠/𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚔𝚢 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚍𝚛𝚊𝚠𝚒𝚗𝚐
𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚍)

Anyway, getting back to what this article is ostensibly about, to get paid as an Instapoet you apparently had to be there early on. The best we can hope for now is some kind of trickledown poetic renaissance.

But probably the Lens of this world are right: it’s day jobs for the foreseeable. We’ll need to keep weighing our good coffee and fancy boxes of herbal tea as loose carrots at the self-service kiosk for a while yet, won’t we, poets?

Rowan is a poet and tree surgeon living in East London. His most recent publication is the short story ‘Beat Phase’, featured in the New Adult anthology ‘It’s Fine, I’m Fine’ (edited by Kat Gynn). It tells the story of a verbose and naive Ginsberg-fanatic’s move to London, that ‘cobbled, storied morgue where you can’t even yawn without swallowing ghosts’, and the subsequent anticlimax known as “adult life”.

30 Years of Before Sunrise: The Greatest Character-Centred Romance of the 20th Century

ON APRIL 11, 2025 / BY EDITORS GEORGE DAVEY & SHIBRA KHAN / LEAVE A COMMENT

Every year, The Brunel Writer Prize is awarded to the student with the highest graded article submission for the Creative Industries module on Brunel University’s Creative Writing Programme. George Davey was a runner-up for The Brunel Writer Prize 2025 with his review of Before Sunrise. SPOILER WARNING.

British Film Institute – Before Sunrise ©

There are Romance films. 

There are Character Studies.

And then there’s Before Sunrise — which is, without debate (or much debate) the greatest character-centred Romance of the 20th Century. 

When Before Sunrise premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in January 1995, few could have predicted the momentous ripples it would send trickling through cinema. It made the shocking revelation that a Romance didn’t need any of the following: lovers who are complete opposites, a host of friends like Mamma Mia’s Rosie and Tanya to provide comic relief, and (most importantly) an overly dramatic misunderstanding the likes of which seen in Leo McCarey’s An Affair to Remember (1957). 

Cinefilosofficial – Before Sunrise ©

Directed by Richard Linklater, Before Sunrise explores a chance encounter between two young strangers, Jesse (Ethan Hawke) and Céline (Julie Delpy), who wander the cobbled streets of Vienna talking about everything under the sun (and moon). The film sticks its middle finger up at “traditional” romance narratives and focuses on the raw, unfiltered conversations Jesse and Céline share in the space of a day and night. 

As the 30th-anniversary approaches, it’s time to shout from the rooftops about Linklater’s intimate attention to character, dialogue, and the fleeting nature of human connection, because at its heart, Before Sunrise is a film about conversation. The plot is simple: Jesse, an American travelling Europe, meets Céline, a French student, on a train. They strike up a conversation that leads to Jesse convincing Céline to disembark with him in Vienna, where they have only hours before his flight back to the United States. This limited time frame provides the structure for their relationship to unfold, lending their dialogue an urgency that feels bittersweet and gripping. 

Before Sunrise is an unapologetic commitment to character-driven storytelling. There is no sweeping melodrama, no absurd misunderstandings, no artificial obstacles. Instead, the film captures the beauty of two people discovering each other in real-time. Jesse and Céline are not idealised lovers but fully realised individuals with flaws and insecurities. Hawke and Delpy’s performances are honest to the point of feeling improvised, their chemistry palpable without ever feeling forced. The dialogue, co-written by Linklater and Kim Krizan, is the film’s chicken soup. The conversations between Jesse and Céline are vulnerable and range from musings on love and death to the absurdities of modern life. Every exchange uncovers another layer of their personalities, revealing their dreams, hopes, and fears. Crucially, the film resists the temptation to provide answers to the questions the characters pose. Instead, it revels in ambiguity, mirroring the uncertainty of life itself.

The Cinematheque – Before Sunrise ©

What makes Before Sunrise timeless is its relatability and nostalgia,  as most viewers can recall a moment in their lives when a fleeting connection felt profound and life-changing (hopefully). The knowledge that Jesse and Céline’s time is finite heightens the poignancy of their every interaction. The ending, in which they part ways without exchanging contact information, is the glacé cherry atop the perfect cake because it leaves their story open-ended and allows viewers to project their dreams and fears onto the narrative.

Looking back after three decades, the film’s legacy is profound. It challenged the conventions of The Romance (capital T, capital R), proving that authenticity and subtlety can resonate more deeply than grand gestures, formulaic plots, and the  “opposites attract” trope.  It inspired a generation of filmmakers to explore character-driven romances, and were it not for Before Sunrise, we may never have seen the likes of Blue Jay (2016) or Lost in Translation (2003).  

Before Sunrise is an Olympic torch of authenticity, its simplicity is its strength, and its characters remain as captivating today as they were in 1995. As we celebrate three decades of this cinematic masterpiece, let’s raise a glass and make the boldest statement in the world of cinema since Darth Vader’s reveal in The Empire Strikes BackBefore Sunrise is the greatest Romance of all time.

Vogue – Before Sunrise ©

George Davey is a British writer based in London. His poetry and prose have appeared in The Horror Tree, Acumen Literary Journal, Phi Magazine, and Anomaly Poetry. Alongside his own writing, George performs as a poet at events across the city. When he’s not writing, he immerses himself in the surreal worlds of Haruki Murakami novels. Stay updated on his latest work by following him on Instagram @ge0rgedavey